The
two-factor theory has been introduced by Herzberg by examine the peoples’
different responses to the question of the situations where they feel good and
bad about their jobs (Dartey-Baah
& Amoako, 2011). Based on that it was identified that there
are certain factors which are related with job satisfaction and there are some
other factors which are related with job dissatisfaction (George &
Jones, 2005). Hence there
are two factors called motivator factors and hygiene factors. The two factors
theory has explained that employee motivation can be achieved with the
challenging but enjoyable work environment which employees are facing with
growth, achievement (Dartey-Baah
& Amoako, 2011).
01. Hygiene Factors – According to Gibson, et al., (2000), these factors include safety, physiological and social needs
according to the hierarchy of needs theory and these factors are related with
the job conditions and not the job itself. When these factors are not available,
the employees will be dissatisfied, and presence of these factors will not lead
to strong motivation among employees. In the case of engineering employees, the
supervision that will get in relation to their projects, the relationships that
they have with other engineers, their salary, job security, policies and
procedures related to their working place and working conditions will be the
hygiene factors. According to Huling ,(2003), these factors are necessary to maintain the satisfaction
at a reasonable level and to reduce dissatisfaction.
02. Motivator Factors
– These factors are within the job itself and related to the job content. Some
of those motivator factors include physiological needs, need for growth and
recognition (Dartey-Baah
& Amoako, 2011). When it comes to engineering employees presence of such
factors can lead to motivation whereas they mainly focus on their achievements
and recognitions. Further the absence of such factors will not cause
dissatisfaction, but presence of these factors can create motivation among
employees. Mainly engineering employees are very much focused on their personal
growth and would like to take responsibilities and initiative. Through that
they always seek recognition and advancement. Hence these factors lead them to
be motivated and these are known as motivator factors according to this theory.
According to Herzberg, (2003), organizations can reduce dissatisfaction by providing
necessary support by supervisors, creating a supportive culture, having good
company policies, providing job security and status of the job. Provision of
such things can help in eliminating dissatisfaction among employees. Further
managers need to understand how to make a job in a way that it gives the
satisfaction to the employees. In such scenario organizations can provide
relevant recognition for their achievements, provide opportunities for their
advancement, match the work with their skills, provide relevant training and
development opportunities to advance their career, provide responsibilities for
each member. These can be applied to engineering employees as well and it is a
must to consider both hygiene and motivator factors since one factor alone
can’t make a huge impact to the motivation of engineering employees.
References
Dartey-Baah, K. & Amoako, G. K., 2011.
Application of Frederick Herzberg’s Two-Factor theory in assessing and
understanding employee motivation at work: a Ghanaian Perspective. European
Journal of Business and Management, 3(9), pp. 1-8.
George, J. M. & Jones, G. R., 2005. Understanding
and managing organizational behavior. 4 ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey:
Pearson Prentice.
Gibson, J. L., Ivancevich, J. M., Donnelly, J. H.
& Konopaske, R., 2000. Organisations-Behaviour, Structure, Processes. 10
ed. New York: McGraw-Hil.
Herzberg, F., 2003. One more time: How do you motivate
employees?. Harvard business review, Volume 81, pp. 87-96.
Huling , E., 2003. Rough Notes. Journal of Applied
Psychology, Volume 2, pp. 17-24.
Agreed with you Dumindu.Organizations are increasingly applying Herzberg’s theory to create opportunities for “personal growth, enrichment and recognition” among their employees (Reuben, 2017).
ReplyDeleteHi Dumindu, Agree on the above content. This theory is the role of employee expectations. Herzberg described of opposite combination between intrinsic incentives and extrinsic incentives. Intrinsic incentives or the basic needs tend to increase but external incentives such as wages and benefits are not always increased and when they continued not to be increased, it may cause dissatisfaction (Owen, 2018).
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteAgreed with you Dumindu.Herzberg hygiene factors, since they are necessary to maintain a reasonable level of satisfaction and can also cause dissatisfaction. The hygiene factors are not direct motivators but are necessary to prevent dissatisfaction and at the same time serve as a starting point for motivation. However, improvements in these conditions do not create motivation, (Hulling 2003)